Reviewed reporting, open evidence gathering and editorial abstention remain separate public states. Every case shows the question, receipts, counterevidence, falsifiers and unresolved collection targets.
0 published0 open research leads2 abstained2 total case files
Publication boundary. An investigation is a reviewed evidence synthesis, not a truth score. Each finding shows supporting evidence, disconfirming evidence, a falsification test and limits. Automated work is labelled RESEARCH LEAD, never presented as a completed investigation.
Reviewed publication
Published investigations
Only cases that passed the structured publication gate and editorial review appear here.
No case currently carries this status.
Only cases that passed the structured publication gate and editorial review appear here.
Evidence gathering
Open research leads
Questions and draft claims remain under test. These cases are not published findings.
No case currently carries this status.
Questions and draft claims remain under test. These cases are not published findings.
Threshold not met
Editorial abstentions
The desk records why available evidence cannot support publication and what would be needed to revisit the question.
Question under test: Across three preregistered comparable rounds, do independent China network-measurement groups converge within twenty percentage points, or does measured interference remain selective and vantage-dependent?
One or more evidence receipts are stale; the lead is retained only as an explicit abstention.
3 claim records · 8 evidence receipts · 5 upstream groups Updated
Question under test: Do current public official, market, and physical series provide enough independent cross-domain and revision history to support a broad direction for China's economy?
One or more evidence receipts are stale; the lead is retained only as an explicit abstention.
3 claim records · 8 evidence receipts · 3 upstream groups Updated