Source index record · Single-source report · not independently verified by Palimpsest
「我的身體為我自己所有」:台灣跨性別與雙性人歷史中的集體記憶、紀念及尊嚴
11月8日,既是我性別肯認荷爾蒙治療的用藥週年紀念日,又是雙性人紀念日。選擇這個日期開始用藥,有它背後的故事和政治原因。我是一名台灣跨性別倡議者,也是一名從事跨性別研究和台灣戰後跨性別歷史研究的獨立學者。台灣首例使用荷爾蒙進行性別轉換的記載來自於1950年代,且該案例與「性別肯認」相去甚遠。祝願這篇《跨日典》的篇章能提醒我們所有人:守護我們的集體記憶本身就是一種抵抗,尤其是當我們的歷史被一群消費我們的受苦、扭曲並複製醫療與檔案暴力現實,以至損害華語世界跨性別與雙性人集體尊嚴的學者書寫時。
Palimpsest did not write or independently verify this publisher report. The record below adds source structure, measurement context when available, revision history and limits.
Record type
Single-source report · not independently verified by PalimpsestThis record indexes one publisher group. Palimpsest has not independently verified or refuted the publisher's claims.
What Palimpsest adds
Attribution, 1 independent source group, topic links, a revision receipt and explicit unknowns. The group count is not a truth probability.
Revision receipt
eventv-58f27985305c5fdd18dcbab5Previous: eventv-58f27985305c5fdd18dcbab5
Publisher reports · attributed, not adopted
What the registered sources published
- New Bloom Magazine. New Bloom Magazine published “「我的身體為我自己所有」:台灣跨性別與雙性人歷史中的集體記憶、紀念及尊嚴”.
Palimpsest addition
What Palimpsest adds to this source report
Source-structure assessment · as of
Added value: Palimpsest adds attribution, independent-source grouping, a revision receipt and follow-up boundaries. It adds no independent factual finding.
Verification status: Palimpsest's view: this is a single attributed report, not an independently established fact. No archive-news-context row matches this event_id. 230 same-window events share a declared topic. Official-page corroboration coverage is none-reviewed. No interconnection peer met an exact join key.
Source structure: The dossier contains one independent source group. Palimpsest treats it as an attributed report, not independent corroboration.
Why this is the bounded position
- The dossier contains one independent source group. Palimpsest treats it as an attributed report, not independent corroboration.
- No Palimpsest collector surface is declared for this event, so the assessment stops at source structure and attribution.
Cited newsroom brief
Lead · present
- New Bloom Magazine published the attributed source item at 2026-11-08T06:43:48Z.
- Evidence strength is single-source across 1 independent source group and 1 attributed source record.
- Palimpsest retained feed title, canonical link, publication time, and a bounded excerpt; it did not fetch the article body.
- No interconnection peer met an exact host, URL path, term, or ASN key inside the UTC ±24h window.
Timeline · abstained
- official-first-seen is missing, so first-seen, last-alive, and hash-change points are omitted.
- news-wire-live is missing, so that capture time is omitted.
Official-page movement · none-reviewed
- No live official-first-seen reading was supplied to this analysis.
- Official-page first-seen, last-alive, and hash values are withheld.
- Official-page corroboration coverage is none-reviewed: 0 accepted edges, 0 primary documents, 0 reviewed.
Deletion-ledger context · abstained
- No public-deletion-ledger item matches this URL or a declared topic surface.
Pipe context · not-declared
- This event does not declare OONI, bleedthrough, vantage, or IODA signal ids, so pipe context is withheld.
Archive-derived context · abstained
- No archive-news-context feature row matches this event id, URL, or declared topic surface.
Counterreadings
- A ledger hit can reflect the ledger's own selection rules rather than a deletion of this URL.
- A hash change or disappearance on an official page can reflect a routine update, a fetch failure, or a removal; the trail does not choose among those.
- A current pipe or undertext value can post-date the article and cannot establish that this article was blocked.
What this brief does not know
- Palimpsest does not know why any page, hash, or ledger item changed.
- Palimpsest did not read the article body and does not verify the publisher's claims.
- Person-level attribution and claims about why an actor acted are outside this brief.
Cited brief · citation coverage 1.0 · automatic publication prohibited · human review required.
Collector findings used
No collector finding is used here. Palimpsest's position is limited to remit, attribution and independent-source structure.
Attributed peer context
- greatfire. GreatFire has no cached 90-day verdict for this host in the current peer warehouse. GreatFire Analyzer, CC BY 4.0. Palimpsest is not the origin of these measurements.
- ooni. OONI has no China measurements on this host in the local warehouse or ooni-gfw-latest reading. OONI Probe / OONI data. Palimpsest is not the origin of these measurements.
- weiboscope. Historical Weiboscope volume is not on this node (Fu, Chan, Chau 2013; doi:10.25442/hku.16674565). Weiboscope / HKU Journalism and Media Studies Centre. Historical 2012 volume is not stored on this node.
Named-key interconnection
No interconnection peer met an exact join key. no_key, silent slots remain coverage gaps, not verdicts.
Analysis analysisv-75006f284825206ab402f419 · structured assessment · immutable revision
Evidence braid
Order, provenance and declared surfaces
-
media · new-bloom-editorial
「我的身體為我自己所有」:台灣跨性別與雙性人歷史中的集體記憶、紀念及尊嚴
· feed sha 6cbb4efb7226
The braid reports source ordering. A declared topic surface is not a timed statistical match and cannot establish cause, coordination, censorship, or economic impact.
Evidence matrix
Inspect every receipt
Scroll horizontally to inspect every column.
| Role | Source / group | Feed record | Published / hash |
|---|---|---|---|
| media | New Bloom Magazinenew-bloom-editorial | 「我的身體為我自己所有」:台灣跨性別與雙性人歷史中的集體記憶、紀念及尊嚴11月8日,既是我性別肯認荷爾蒙治療的用藥週年紀念日,又是雙性人紀念日。選擇這個日期開始用藥,有它背後的故事和政治原因。我是一名台灣跨性別倡議者,也是一名從事跨性別研究和台灣戰後跨性別歷史研究的獨立學者。台灣首例使用荷爾蒙進行性別轉換的記載來自於1950年代,且該案例與「性別肯認」相去甚遠。祝願這篇《跨日典》的篇章能提醒我們所有人:守護我們的集體記憶本身就是一種抵抗,尤其是當我們的歷史被一群消費我們的受苦、扭曲並複製醫療與檔案暴力現實,以至損害華語世界跨性別與雙性人集體尊嚴的學者書寫時。 | feed sha 6cbb4efb7226 |
Measurement surfaces
Where Palimpsest can test the topic
No Palimpsest measurement surface is declared for this event. That absence is not evidence that no measurable change occurred.
Epistemic boundary
What this dossier cannot establish
- Palimpsest retained only feed title, canonical link, time, and a bounded plain-text excerpt; it did not fetch the article body.
- The evidence-strength label describes source structure, not truth, intent, impact, or causation.
- Declared instrument links are topical pointers until a separate scan or economic observation is joined by time and method.
- Title-similarity clustering can miss differently worded or cross-language accounts and can join closely worded updates.
- This dossier currently contains one independent evidence group and remains explicitly attributed.